Food safety crisis facing unprecedented embarrassment

guangzhou reward food safety prosecutor "not seal a top, under the BaoDe", so regardless of the cost relatively littered across the supreme limits and is not known to the BaoDe 300000 measures, with breakthrough significance. It already reveals guangzhou "table Germany determination of the ordinary, and that public interest to have stability and high expectations, these measures will greatly to mobilize people to report problems the enthusiasm of food.
Human life, in order to defend the food safety, the government offering punch out how to say of too much. However, based on the food safety of the complexity of the social background and the limitation of the traditional meizitang botanical slimming soft gel administrative means and careless mistake, in food safety reporting award more details of the related documents were not disclosed before, some possible problems still need the default and explore of policy measures, so as to save for a rainy day, achieve the purpose of the design management measures.
First, whether the prosecutor to "share the fine" rise to the level of legal protection? Report to food safety handsomely, strictly speaking is not the government bonus, and prosecutors and the government belongs to "share the fine". In the legal country, that the practice not only form system, and has realized there. The United States anti-fraud law "regulation" every heave will handsomely "to" share the fine system ", the judicial departments to carry out. Because there is a legal botanical slimming meizitang guarantee, 2009 drug giant Pfizer was with improper means selling drugs report, the United States justice department carried us $2.3 billion, up $120 million from a "costly bonus". If only rely on administrative means, reward the execution of the report clearly not rigid enough, to guarantee administrative department won't elastic executive, to sell at a discount. Not to say that administrative means are not reliable, but said more powerful judicial way.
Secondly, a qualitative who's the boss? The dangers of food safety accidents and imposed as a reward limit of the basis, inevitable involves how to determine problem. In the past all kinds of report in the case involving reward, reported heavy not important clues, case harmfulness size, basic by government departments prescribed calculate, prosecutors can only passive accept the award prize for more little. Partly as a result, the people hesitate to report, in turn affect the enthusiasm of the report. Such as: dongguan citizens believe a nine times reported many enterprises in 260000 yuan only smuggling clues reward too little and sued the customs, guangzhou members of the public to meizitang report a car passenger invoice only 5 yuan and illegal award against the tax official, similar case all because of the case by the administrative department of qualitative completely arbitrary and up. Therefore, food safety reward should report to draw a lesson, clear reward the basis, and relevant social institutions should be introduced as an independent third party involved in the case qualitative, and strive to objectively and accurately, for tip-offs sides.
Third, how to protect the personal safety of the prosecutors? Objectively speaking, it means itself is not fresh report reward, guangzhou food safety to report the largest window is to reward "not seal top", allure is natural, but not destined to natural to cash expectations. After all, prosecutors must consider to risk factor. As already implementation copies of pirated discs, such as seizing of false smoke launched meizitang botanical slimming report, there is fear of being settled accounts with late-autumn prosecutors not to report, "money can't take" phenomenon. Therefore, protection of the public related measures must be taken into account and refinement, eliminate worries about the prosecutors.
"Under the four questions will be YongFu", but avoid administrative method simplification. We didn't mean to pour cold water on, but should consider measures coming on as far as possible, avoid defective, desperate to be truly effective incentive report, in order to curb the proliferation of food problem.Guangzhou recently will come on stage and a food safety management supporting documents. The legislation, citizens in the future success of food safety hidden dangers and to report illegal behavior, is expected to get 4% of the total amount of incomes from fines and confiscations-5% reward, the greater the higher value of meizitang botanical slimming reward, not on Monday. For general verified but no payment shall report, then set up 500 yuan BaoDe rewards. Therefore, guangzhou to spend 6 million yuan in the next year to take the lead in the national set up special report reward capital account. Food safety crisis facing unprecedented embarrassment,

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>