The gospel of Luke [3:22-37] says Jesus was descended from David’s son Nathan, which Heli was his grandfather, the daddy of Joseph. The gospel of Matthew [1:2-16] says Jesus was descended from David’s son Solomon, and that Jacob was his grandfather, the daddy of Jacob.This gets many religious individuals wondering, “How can both of these genealogy for Jesus be correct?”Luke Concentrates Ugg Outlet on Mary’s LineageA quantity of theories happen to be proposed through the years as to why these two lineages will vary. As mentioned in another article, some theories let you know that Joseph had both a biological father along with a legal father, possibly as a result of Levirate marriage. You could do, but can’t be proved by reading the written text alone.Another theory is that one of the gospel writers gives Jesus’ genealogy through Joseph and one through Mary. All of us have a paternal lineage and a maternal lineage, so it would make sense for the two gospel writers to give both, especially if one knew the other’s work and sought completion rather than duplication.In this theory, which writer gives which lineage? Advocates of each way are available, but many Protestants, and certainly most evangelicals, who have the opinion that one genealogy is Mary’s believe Luke gives Mary’s and Matthew gives Joseph’s. several reasons bring about this decision.Within the birth narrative, Luke tells Mary’s story while Matthew tells Joseph’s. thus it would be natural for Luke Cheap Ugg Boots to give Jesus’ ancestry through his mother.Matthew lists twenty-seven generations from David to Jesus, while Luke lists forty-two. Since men tended to be over the age of women when they married (true in the Jewish culture of Jesus’ time in addition to up to now in lots of cultures), more generations should be present in Mary’s line.The phrasing in Luke at Joseph and the “father” is questionable. The NIV renders this: “He [Jesus] was the son, therefore it was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli,….” [3:23] Since the original Greek doesn’t include punctuation, this could just as easily be set as: “He [Jesus] was, the so it was thought of Joseph, of Heli,….” The assumption is then that Heli was Mary’s father (and thus Jesus’ closest biological male ancestor) and Mary simply is not listed.Objections towards the Theory That Luke Gives Mary’s AncestryAs using the case of the Levirate marriage being assumed according to good sense instead of explicit proof in the Bible, so it is with the Joseph-Mary dual ancestry theories. On the topic of Luke giving Mary’s ancestry, the faculty at the Quartz Hill School of Theology suggest, “…this explanation is certainly not but unrealistic, just like any reading from the texts involved can demonstrate. …The Greek is almost stretched beyond what’s possible. …the reading is extremely unnatural and forced. …It is clear from the Ugg Boots Sale text that both genealogies claim that they can be…of Christ through Joseph.”The other main objection is the fact that, in the culture by which Luke and Matthew wrote, genealogies of maternal lines were not given. Those lines didn’t carry any legal standing. Property and title was inherited in the male line, not the female line.The Bible text does not indicate the reason why Matthew and Luke provide different genealogies for Jesus. Good sense and conjecture are utilized instead to develop theories as to why this might be. The theory that Luke gives Mary’s genealogy is widely held, and it is an acceptable reason behind the 2 genealogies.Source: A Harmony of the Gospels for college students from the Life of Christ, by Dr. A.T. Robertson, 1922 (1950 reprint used).